Wednesday, January 31, 2018

The Residence on Marine – West Vancouver

The Residences on Marine is being developed by Atti group and will be a boutique mid-rise building. Located at 1327 Marine Drive in West Vancouver, the Residence on Marine is centrally located at the entrance to the Ambleside community of West Vancouver, featuring Ambleside Park and Beach, as well all the shops and services along Marine Drive including its popular Farmers Market on the weekends.

The Residences on Marine will provide its homeowners to the best of the North Shore and Vancouver. With single-level living, featuring modern, open floor plans, attention to detail and high-quality craftsmanship.

To be kept up to date with this development and many more like it, register with us today.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is not an offering for sale. No such offering can be made without a disclosure statement. E.&O.E.

The post The Residence on Marine – West Vancouver appeared first on Vancouver New Condos.



from Buildings – Vancouver New Condos http://ift.tt/2DQNcox

Crest by Adera- North Vancouver

Crest is Lonsdale newest development being built by Adera, the multi-disciplined organization known for creating homes with West Coast style. Crest is located in the heart of North Vancouver Lonsdale corridor on the corner of 8th and Lonsdale at 150 East 8th Street.

Crest will include 178 one, two and three bedroom homes (including 17 townhomes) with underground parking over two buildings all designed in a West coast modern design and architecture that Adera has become well-known for. Some homes will feature Private roof top patio, stunning views of the north shore mountains and and downtown Vancouver

 

Building amenities include a bike room, guest suite, party room, fitness studio, billiards room and much more. In addition to great condos, the location offers easy accessibility to golf, local parks, restaurants and other entertainment sites, too.

To stay up to date with this development and many others like it, register with us today!

 

 

 

 

E. & O. E. This is not an offering for sale. An offering for sale may only be made after filing a Disclosure Statement

The post Crest by Adera- North Vancouver appeared first on Vancouver New Condos.



from Buildings – Vancouver New Condos http://ift.tt/2E1wVQJ

Betts Paid Off

Mookie Betts won his arbitration hearing with the Red Sox. The Red Sox offered him $7.5 million for the 2018 season, Betts asked for $10.5 million. That nearly set a record for a player in his first season of arbitration.

The story points out that the $3 million difference means that Betts be able to get bigger raises going forward, and could potentially make an extra $12 million over the three-year arbitration period.

Of course, the Red Sox are getting a great deal at $10.5 million. Betts averages six WAR a year his first three full seasons. That (in a normal year), would be worth around $40 million on the free agent market. Since first-year free agents should be worth around 40% of the free agent price, he might have expected $16 million.

On the other hand, free agent values seem to be down this year, and Betts contract indicates that teams want to pay around $4.4 million per WAR, rather than the $8 million one might expect from inflation.

The next free agent class is going to be fascinating. If the owners can lower the price, more teams will bid on the likes of Bryce Harper at $5 million per WAR than $8 million per WAR. Maybe even the Nationals would sign him to a long term deal before he hits the market at that price. I’ve never seen salaries fall this much.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2nqkS5X

Southgate City – Burnaby

Back in 2011, developer Ledingham McAllister bought the old Safeway distribution centre and dairy plant with an ambitious vision in mind. It isn’t often that a fully masterplanned development like Southgate City comes to a major city like Burnaby. This new condo development will become an integral part of the skyline in South Burnaby. As envisioned, Southgate City will include up to 20 condo towers of between 24 and 46 storeys in height, and a variety of low- and mid-rise buildings, all of which combined will consist of about 6,400 residential housing units that will support a population of 20,000 people. The pedestrian- and public-transit oriented development is planned around a five-acre central park that will serve as the Southgate City’s core feature.

The 60-acre development also includes numerous smaller parks, creek-side greenways and open areas, all of which are designed to help foster interconnection between all of its residential and commercial elements. This planned interconnectedness also includes easy access to the rest of Burnaby, and greater Vancouver, via road upgrade connections, pedestrian/bicycling paths, and its proximity to the Edmonds Skyway Station. Proposed commercial ventures include a gourmet grocer, cafés, community shops and restaurants. A new community centre is also included in the plans. The final result will be a stunning community developed from the ground up.

Southgate City will rapidly become one of the most exciting places to live in all of the lower mainland.

With the first building, Precedence, starting sales soon; home buyers will have the opportunity to secure their view of what will become the definition of master planning. Residents will be able to wake up and look out to the green space, fountains, and inviting public spaces. Driving to the hottest restaurants and shops will be a thing of the past with the best that Burnaby has to offer just steps away.

What sets Southgate City apart from other developments is the attention to detail put into every aspect of the design. There are plenty of new condo developments to see in Burnaby and surrounding areas but few, if any, offer the total and complete lifestyle that Southgate City will offer. A new community centre is just one part of the plan that aims to provide residents with a superior living experience in the heart of South Burnaby.

This will undoubtedly be one of the most exciting, inspirational, and popular new condo developments in Burnaby and the entire lower mainland. Stay tuned for more news and developments about Southgate City as construction moves ahead.

To be kept up to date with Southgate city, Register with us today.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is not an offering for sale. No such offering can be made without a disclosure statement. E.&O.E.

The post Southgate City – Burnaby appeared first on Vancouver New Condos.



from Buildings – Vancouver New Condos http://ift.tt/2nqf64i

Gamble Passes

Oscar Gamble died today, Wednesday, at age 68. My thoughts go out to his family and friends:

But the most iconic aspect of Gamble’s career was his Afro in the early 1970s. In a 2016 interview, Gamble told The Daytona Beach News-Journal that he had to trim his hair when he joined the Yankees in 1976, to comply with owner George Steinbrenner’s grooming policy.

“I got there in spring training, I didn’t have a uniform,” Gamble told the newspaper. “(Manager) Billy (Martin) told me I had to get a haircut before I get a uniform.

“And I never grew it back. It was just a ’70s thing, that’s all it was.”

It was by far the best Afro in the majors. I believe people noticed it due to Gamble verve playing the game. He always hustled, always looking like he enjoyed every moment on the field. He was fast, and that speed often led to his cap, which sat more on his hairdo than his head, would come flying off. The closest to that today is Bryce Harper, whose high hair often dislodges his batting helmet as he flies around the bases.

Gamble’s strength lay in his on-base percentage, .365 for his career. His pop was decent as well, with a .189 isolated power. I always enjoyed watching him play.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2DRBIFp

Simplify with Kimura, Dan Gable, and Fedor

What’s Different About Account Based Marketing/Selling?

Account Based Marketing/Selling is all the rage today.  if you haven’t jumped on that bandwagon, you clearly aren’t one of the cool kids.

But having played in this space for more than a few years, a lot of what I see is deja-vu all over again, echoing concepts from the 80’s, 90’s, even before (look at some of the original books on account based selling and when they were published.

There are some differences in ABM/ABS–ironically, very few people talk about them, except some of those grizzled veterans who have lived this through their careers.

It seems marketers in ABM have discovered something really unique.  It’s called personalization and relevance.  Apparently with ABM, we target our marketing programs to the right people within an account, talking about issues we know to be relevant to the account.

Hmmm, isn’t that what good marketing is supposed to do anyway?  Aren’t we trying to target everyone we inflict our marketing efforts on?  Aren’t we trying to be relevant to each of them?  Technology, has given us huge capabilities to do this, but it seems (if my inbox is any indicator), that we don’t leverage the capabilities we are paying for, instead choosing to inundate the world with the same messages that may have relevance to a fraction of the audience.

Granted, ABM enables us to narrow the focus more, but we can target our messages by industry group, by persona within industry group, by organizational demographics within those industry groups, by functions within those organizations.  We can increase our relevance by any number of dimensions for 100% of our marketing, improving the results we get from 100% of the marketing.

Yes, with ABM, we can be even more targeted, “We know that XYZ is a strategic initiative in your organization, and top management has established this goal……”  (Ironically, I never see ABM programs that say something to this effect, even though they could.  Perhaps, I’m not looking in the right places.)

Account Based Selling is similar, we dedicate people to accounts, so we can increase our knowledge and relevance to the accounts.  But again, there is no excuse for any sales person, not to have studied the account, not to have researched the individuals before the first contact or meeting.  Technology and tools have given us this capability for virtually any organization, but too often we aren’t leveraging this.

Somehow we tend to think of an account as something different than anything else we do.  In reality, an account is just a different form of territory.  Some territories may be organized by geography (for instance a city or set of postal/zip codes), an industry segment (for example insurance, commercial banking, etc), a named list of companies, or a single company.

The job of the sales person is to maximize their share of territory-however that territory might be defined.  They have to analyze the territory, build new relationships, expand their reach, leverage referrals and other relationships in the territory.

When I first started selling, I had one named account, with principal operations at 1 New York Plaza and Chase Plaza in downtown Manhattan.  A friend had the states of North and South Dakota.  Our jobs were exactly the same, we were supposed to turn over every stone in our territories, finding every opportunity we could.  Our quotas were different, based on territory potential–mine was about 15 times hers, but our fundamental jobs were exactly the same.

Lest you think I’m bashing ABM/ABS, I’m not, I’m fully supportive of ABM/ABS principles–except those are just the principles of outstanding marketing and selling, regardless of whether they are account focused, industry focused, geo focused.  The wonderful thing is technology and tools have eliminated any excuse we might have to being knowledgeable, focused, and relevant with any and all customers.

There are some differences in an Account Based focus, ironically, I see very little discussion about these.  Most of the account based stuff is purely focused on “how do we sell more to this account?”

The account based focus enables us to profoundly change the relationship with the account.  To move from vendor, potentially to strategic partner.  It can profoundly change the value we create with these partners, moving truly into co-creation, often in ways that extend beyond the relationship with the account itself.

Too often, we create and inflict account status on accounts, simply because they are important to us, when we are just another vendor to them.  But if we can find ways of becoming strategically more important, we start looking at much stronger collaborative structures between organizations.  We seek and gain much stronger executive sponsorship both from our company and with the account.  We form much more collaborative projects, with governance structures to help each of us to achieve our goals.  We have joint planning, aligned priorities, we both are making investments in things that allow us to achieve our collective and individual objectives.

These accounts can become fertile grounds for developing new approaches and new products, we can launch into other markets.  These accounts can give us access to their supply chains, extending our reach and our ability to grow.

However, this extended view of the account seems to be missing from most of the discussion.  Most of what I see is simply limited to “how do we sell more,” rather than how do we profoundly change the value we co-create, creating much bigger opportunities for each party in the account.

Where’s that leave us?  A big Yes to all the things we are talking about on ABM/ABS–but these should be the foundational principles for everything we do in sales and marketing!

The real opportunity for Account Based initiatives is not merely selling them more stuff, but it is profoundly changing the value creation model to drive step function changes in the relationship, and the value we each get from this relationship  (yes it means huge increases in revenue we get from these accounts, not just the next sale from these accounts.)

 



from Partners in EXCELLENCE Blog — Making A Difference http://ift.tt/2BGSwsJ

Random Player Report

The Random Evil Player program selected Blake Parker for the next review. Parker is an odd duck. A relief pitcher, he was not called up to the majors until his seasonal age 27 season in 2012. In parts of three seasons with the Cubs he produced good rates on this three-true outcomes, with a weakness for the home run. He spent 2015 in Mexico, but returned to the majors in 2016 with a very high walk rate. He was released a number of times before the Angels signed him, and he turned in an excellent year for LAnaheim. Overall his TTO line looks like 10.6/2.8/1.0 K/BB/HR per 9 IP. He tended to walk batters in the minors, but with age came control without a loss of power. We’ll see how long he can keep this going, but the Angels found a solid reliever.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2nu3Pza

Tuesday, January 30, 2018

The MLB NSA

MLB will be tapping bullpen phones:

Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic reports that, in an effort to stanch this kind of behavior, MLB is installing new phones in every dugout, and the league will also now record all conversations that take place on those dugout phones. Rosenthal goes on to explain the thinking behind this new measure:

To avoid detection in the new climate, a player who steals signs by watching video in the replay room will need to walk to the dugout and relay the sign to the runner on the second base, who then would signal to the hitter at home plate — a much more laborious process than simply conveying sign-stealing information by phone.

While they are at it, maybe they should assign armed security guards to each player to make sure they don’t use PEDs. This is getting kind of ridiculous.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2DPIz1M

Towers Passes

Kevin Towers succumbed to thyroid cancer:

Former San Diego Padres and Arizona Diamondbacks general manager Kevin Towers has died after a battle with thyroid cancer. He was 56.

Barry Axelrod, Towers’ friend and former agent, told The Associated Press that Towers died Tuesday at a hospital. Towers’ wife, Kelley, was at his side.

Axelrod said Towers was admitted to a hospital with fluid on his lungs a few days ago, and friends and family members thought he would be able to go home Tuesday.

Towers was diagnosed with anaplastic thyroid cancer in 2016.

My thoughts go out to his family and friends.

Towers became the Padres GM in 1995, and I remember him being rather sabermetrically inclined. Theo Epstein got his start under Towers, so he will have a long lineage of that type of GM.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2nss6pw

Boras Complains

Scott Boras complains about non-competitiveness:

“We have a non-competitive cancer that’s ruining the fabric of this sport,’’ Boras says. “And until we change the system, this is going to continue.

“Remember when Bud Selig used to always say that every fan must have hope and faith? That was his legacy. He said, ‘If you remove hope and faith from the fan, you destroy the fabric of the sport. My job is to restore that.’

“Those were Bud’s words, not mine.

“Well, the modern administration is not listening to that credo. Where’s that hope and faith now?’’

Jerry Dipoto throws some fuel on the fire:

“You could argue you’re going to compete with more clubs to get the first pick in the draft,’’ Dipoto told Seattle reporters, “than you would to win the World Series.’’

There is a very simple solution for ending tanking. Eliminate the draft and spending caps on amateurs. I’ll note that we never heard the word tanking before MLB instituted slot bonuses. There is a history of teams with the first pick passing on better players since they felt they could not afford to sign them. In other words, there was a penalty for tanking, the first round pick might cost you more than you could afford.

Slot bonuses subsidize tanking. At least get rid of the bonuses. There is a moral case, however, for getting rid of all these structures. A free market in players, from the youngest amateur to the oldest veteran is the fairest system. It’s time to tear down all these rules on drafting, reserving, arbitrating, and freeing and just concentrate on paying players for their value. Yes, it will be more work for the front offices and the players and their agents, but we won’t have teams intentionally tanking to gain a future advantage.

Hat tip to BBTF. The post there doesn’t like Boras’s plan to solve this situation.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2nnQtoU

Monday, January 29, 2018

Main & Twentieth by Landa Global in Vancouver

Main & Twentieth is a collection of 42 boutique one bedroom, two bedroom, and loft homes with stylish interiors, open layouts, generous outdoor spaces, and a beautiful, lush central courtyard. Located at the corner of Main St & E 20th Ave, Main & Twentieth is surrounded by all the eclectic shops, restaurants, schools, transit and diverse community resources that Main Street has to offer.

The post Main & Twentieth by Landa Global in Vancouver appeared first on Vancouver New Condos.



from Buildings – Vancouver New Condos http://ift.tt/2GtugOc

Park Hill in Langley

PARK HILL is a new community coming soon to Langley’s Willoughby neighbourhood, located off 68th Ave and 201 St, in a peaceful residential neighbourhood giving you room to breathe. This boutique collection of 2 & 3 bedroom townhomes and contemporary 1, 2 & 3 bedroom condos is located in a quiet residential area nestled against 1,200 acres of lush parkland and community trails. Park Hill has two phases of development. Phase I is over 80% sold and moving quickly. Register now to have our team contact you with details about our remaining inventory, and for priority access to Phase II.

The post Park Hill in Langley appeared first on Vancouver New Condos.



from Buildings – Vancouver New Condos http://ift.tt/2nkylwi

Busy in Kansas City

The Royals signed Alcides Escobar to a one-year deal, bringing back one of their free-agent players. They also made a trade with the Athletics to clear some salary:

They traded first baseman and outfielder Brandon Moss and left-handed reliever Ryan Buchter to the Oakland Athletics in exchange for right-handed pitchers Jesse Hahn and Heath Fillmyer. The Royals also cleared $5 million of Moss’ salary in the trade.

“The economic part of it is very real to us,” Royals general manager Dayton Moore told The Star.

First baseman Eric Hosmer, who became a free agent after seven seasons with the Royals, is still unsigned.

Moss returns to Oakland. He hit very well in his first stint there, but his power and ability to get on base waned since then. If the Royals continue to sign their own players, the collusion talk will get more serious.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2nt2F7l

The Defeat of Chief Wahoo

The Indians agreed to remove Chief Wahoo from their uniforms, but not until 2019:

MLB and the Indians opted to have the Native American caricature removed from the on-field uniforms next year, but the logo will still have a limited retail presence in Northeast Ohio and Goodyear, Ariz. In order to maintain control of the trademark, ensuring that another group could not seize it and profit, the Indians needed to retain some level of retail involving the logo.

Cleveland may consider adding a new complementary logo in the future, but it will focus on the Block C as the primary symbol for now. There are no plans to change the team’s name.

So they need to save the logo to destroy the logo.

The decision to remove the logo on the Indians’ uniforms next year coincides with Cleveland hosting the 2019 MLB All-Star Game, which was awarded to the franchise last January. The Indians have indicated that MLB did not force the team to remove the logo in order to be granted the right to host the Midsummer Classic. Cleveland’s pitch to hold the event began years ago, and it became a strong focus during the team’s postseason run in ’16.

I’m going to be a bit cynical here. The logo is disappearing, but not until next season, which conveniently avoids any protests at the All-Star Game. While the logo won’t be on the uniforms, local fans of the Indians will still be able to purchase merchandise with the logo. I would not be at all surprised to learn that after the 2019 season, the team finds that there is a demand among their fans to bring back the logo, and low and behold, it reappears in 2020. We will see.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2nhM3A3

Expansion’s Best

MLB ranks the top 25 teams of the expansion era. I like the 1998 Yankees as the top team. I would probably rank the 1986 Mets and the 1970s Athletics teams higher.

Bill James believes that the 1970s Royals, who lost to the Yankees in multiple ALCS playoffs, were a better team than that New York squad. They do not make the list however. It would appear that a World Series win is required for inclusion.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2DLv6YX

Judging the Ties

Aaron Judge and Giancarlo Stanton attended the New York BBWAA dinner Sunday night. Judge came off a bit cooler, as he went with a straight black bow tie that he appeared to tie himself, while Stanton used a pre-tied butterfly. Both received awards at the dinner, along with others who picked up major awards.

On a more serious note, Stanton talked about his late teammate, Jose Fernandez:

“He said, ‘Hey, if this doesn’t work down here, I’m gonna be a free agent, and I’m gonna sign with the Yankees and you’re coming with me,’ ” Stanton said. “Well, now I’m here and I’m gonna take a little piece of him with me and bring it to New York. It’s great to be here.”



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2njtlrD

“Active Listening” Is Not A Technique

Catching up on my reading, I ran across an article on Active Listening.  It was focused on sales people and the author made the statement, “Active listening makes them feel like they are being heard…..”

I’m sure that’s not what the author intended to communicate, but it got me thinking about many other things I hear and read about active listening.

Active listening–at least true active listening is not a technique.  We know some of the things we do in active listening–playing back what the individual is saying, mirroring, probing/questioning.  These are all very important and very helpful in understanding.

And that’s really the point of active listening–it is to understand, it is to want to learn, it is to truly care.  Active listening isn’t good because the other party feels like they are being heard, active listening works because the person is genuinely being heard.

Active listening enables us to see things from the customer point of view–not just factually, but emotionally.  We get to understand their hopes, dreams, aspirations.  We get to understand their fears, concerns.  We can’t listen actively if we aren’t engaged.

Can you imagine, listening, while browsing texts on your phone,  nodding sympathetically and periodically saying “I feel your pain….”  Yeah, I know I’m exaggerating, but sometimes the discussions on active listening seem like variants of this.

Ironically, active listening/engagement generally begets active listening/engagement.  That is, when we are genuinely listening, actively, the people we are listening to will also tend to start listening actively.

Then we–each person–become engaged in a conversation.  Then we become engaged in learning/discovering.  We become more open to different points of view.  We become empathetic as opposed to sympathetic.

People buy from people who listen to them.  People buy from people they trust, people buy from people who care.  People buy from people who can and want to help them succeed.

This only starts with genuine active listening.

 



from Partners in EXCELLENCE Blog — Making A Difference http://ift.tt/2GoBRxo

Sunday, January 28, 2018

Random Player Report

The Random Evil Player program selected Kristopher Negron for the next review. Negron spent parts of four seasons in the majors since 2012, spending both 2013 and 2016 in the minors. He played for Arizona in 2017 in a utility role.

Negron hit poorly in his time in the majors, with a .214/.296/.338 slash line. His strength as a hitter is drawing walks, but he strikes out too much for a player with little power. When he batted in a table setter slot, he performed well. His whole career is such a small sample size that it is difficult to get any accurate read of his abilities. He enters the 2018 season at age 32, and I suspect he is done as an MLB player.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2DJO3XK

Oakland Anniversary

The Athletics expect to set an attendance record on April 17th, the 50th anniversary of the team’s debut in Oakland:

The A’s free game April 17 will be packed, with huge demand for tickets. To accommodate all those fans, the team expects to take down even the tarps that cover Mount Davis, according to a source.

Team president Dave Kaval said Saturday at the team’s FanFest in Jack London Square that the April 17 crowd “could be the largest attended game for baseball in the history of the Coliseum.”

The largest A’s game attendance in Coliseum history was 55,989 on June 26, 2004, against the Giants, but there is now more standing-room-only space.

There’s going to be a giant cake, but no word on a celebratory sewage flood. 🙂



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2DHgrhi

Carvajal Passes

Former pitcher Marcos Carvajal died on Tuesday. He died due to a drug shortage:

Alejandro Castillejo, president of the state’s baseball association, told The Associated Press on Saturday that Carvajal checked himself into a hospital in December suffering from a respiratory illness. He said the former pitcher’s family had to scramble to find antibiotics that have all but disappeared from the shelves of Venezuela.

Eventually the drugs were sent from abroad and Carvajal returned to the home he shared with his siblings and grandparents. But his boss said he grew alarmed when Carvajal didn’t return to work as expected after the Christmas holiday.

“We were calling him but he wouldn’t tell us what was happening,” Castillejo said. “We assume he was depressed by the situation, his illness and especially the high cost of the medicine.”

Carvajal was rushed to the hospital Monday suffering from a relapse and died a day later, Castillejo said. He was 34.

My thoughts go out to his family and friends.

Carvajal pitched very briefly in the majors, accumulating just 57 innings, all in relief. He actually pitched well at Coors Field, but poorly on the road. In his career in the minors, he could never get his walk rate under control, which likely kept him from spending more time in the majors.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2DHYDmi

Saturday, January 27, 2018

Machado to Short

The Orioles will play Manny Machado at shortstop and Tim Beckham at third base this season. I disagree with the move. Machado is a great defensive third baseman, who over his career showed he can shine at the hot corner. While he may be a good shortstop, I doubt at this point he will be a great shortstop. Third base is about quick reactions and a strong arm. Shortstop is about range and turning double plays. Machado has been away from the position long enough that those skills will need to be relearned. This isn’t Cal Ripken moving to shortstop in his rookie year.

The Orioles are also inviting a higher chance of injury. I understand Machado’s bat will be more valuable as a shortstop, but it doesn’t seem worth the risk at this point in his career. That the Orioles are allowing the move tells me they are not planning to keep him past 2018.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2DHscV8

Tax Distortion

Jeff Passan discusses the current free agent impasse and the wider problems with MLB labor relations. One problem is that the union didn’t understand taxes. The competitive balance tax (CBT) is cited as a big reason by teams for the slow free agent season, but the union likes the CBT:

The consequences are obvious. Officials with the Los Angeles Dodgers and New York Yankees, two teams looking to dip beneath the threshold and reset their base tax burden to 20 percent after paying a 50 percent overage for constantly exceeding it, have acknowledged they certainly would have spent more this winter were the threshold higher, according to sources.

A memo sent by the union to players upon the completion of the CBA in 2016 highlights not just the missed opportunity but a view of CBT penalties that multiple executives said simply doesn’t compute. The memo, obtained by Yahoo Sports, emphasizes the victories the union gained in the new agreement and, under the heading “CORE ECONOMICS,” says: “Increased the tax burden for the highest and most habitual CBT offenders.”

Though theoretically good for competitive balance, the tax has offered high-revenue teams this offseason an excuse from spending. Compound that with upward of a dozen teams either spending insignificant sums or straight-up tanking, and what long has been a robust free agent experience suddenly is fraught with pressure to accept undervalued deals.

Taxation is a tough business. Taxes in general discourage the activity taxed. Prices are signals, and raising prices through taxation sends the message, “Consume less of this.” That turned out to be a better solution to the alcohol abuse problem that prohibition tried to solve, for example.

The competitive balance tax, along with free agent compensation, raises the price of a free agent. It sends the message, “Consume fewer free agents,” or “Pay free agents less.” The tax became so punitive that even the Yankees noticed.

Since the MLBPA reopened the CBA to deal with the steroid issue, MLB has been cleaning the union’s clock. The MLBPA was once the greatest union ever, but now they appear not to understand fairly basic economics. It’s not clear what they can offer the owners to move them away from rules that limit free agency. They never thought the front offices would figure out how to game the system to their advantage. Thirty years of ever rising salaries lured the union and the players into complacency. Instead of fighting for ever increasing freedom of movement for players (fewer years to arbitration and free agency, dismantling of the draft, no caps on foreign spending), they worked to keep the number of free agents small, as the lack of supply appeared to drive up prices. That model doesn’t work anymore, and the union doesn’t have a way out.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2DDlgnO

Friday, January 26, 2018

Making A Difference, Thinking Of Others

In December, I launched my 2017/2018 Charity Water campaign.  I set the goal to hit $7500, I’ll be matching up to $2500, so we have the opportunity to raise $10,000.

We already have about $4K, Thanks to everyone who has supported and contributed to this program!  It really makes a difference.  I’d love to have others join and contribute at Charity:Water.  This campaign will bring total contributions, since I started, close to $60,000.

Whenever I run this campaign, I have so many people reaching out to me, sharing their passions and the organizations they support with their time and money.  I’d like to mention a couple that really had an impact on me.  I encourage you to look at what they are doing and consider supporting them.

Nagesh Kanumury and I spoke of a program, in which he is coaching a team of children.  This team is addressing the water problem in a different and very cool way.  They recognize that some communities can’t drill wells, that transporting the water will still be required.  They decided, they were going to create a wagon/cart to help carry more water, more easily.  But their creativity went a step further.  They thought, while that water is being transported, they can work on the “clean part.”  Their design includes filters that can be inserted in each container, to clean contaminants.  At the same time, they have installed a small solar array, to hear and purify the water–all while being transported.

It’s a hugely clever design by a group of elementary/junior high school kids.  They call their team the Hytdrobots.  They’ve won their first rounds of competition at the First Lego League.  I believe they are going to the California state-wide competition.  You can see their display at this link:  (Hyrdrobots), you can learn more about the competition and cheer them on at:  First Lego League.  Look for the Hydrobots from Silicon Valley and cheer them on!  You can reach out to Nagesh for more information.

It’s really inspiring to see these kids, not only being wickedly creative, but doing something that can help so many people!

The second is my friend Carlos Hidalgo.  At the moment, Carlos is in Uganda is working as part of a project called Beauty For Ashes.  One of the things that makes this really close to my heart is that I believe Carlos is touring some villages where, through my Charity:Water campaigns, we’ve built wells!  Here’s a cool video of one being opened!  I’m not sure our contributions funded this one, but I know we’ve built at least three wells in Uganda.  Carlos is both contributing his time and raising money for Beauty for Ashes.

Please consider supporting Carlos in his work.

The third are my friends Mitch Little and Hendre Coetzee.  They’ve been supporters of my campaigns, but decided to take matters into their own hands.  They wrote a great book, Shiftability.  I’ve done some reviews of it, in addition to it being a great book, 100% of the profits are going to their own Charity:Water campaign.  To date, I understand they’ve raised $10’s of thousands.

It’s so easy to get caught up in our jobs, our own families, and our lives.  We often lose sight of how truly fortunate we are.  I think it’s so important that each of us finds opportunities and means to help people we may never meet.  Whether you want to contribute to one of these programs or you have your own passion, it’s really important to give to others, unconditionally.

While it does so much good, there’s a selfish aspect to it–at least for me.  It makes me feel so good and happy!

So please, I’d love your support with Charity:Water.  I’d love to have you support the Hydrobots or Carlos or Mitch and Hendre.  I’d love to hear your story and promote it in another of these posts in about a month.

Thanks for caring, thanks for contributing, thanks for building a better world.  Each of us can Make A Difference!

 



from Partners in EXCELLENCE Blog — Making A Difference http://ift.tt/2Ea1zoF

The Payroll Dilemma

The MLBPA takes the Pirates and the Marlins to task for not spending revenue sharing money on improving the team:

Both teams receive more than $50 million from revenue sharing, which takes money from the highest-revenue teams and gives it to the lowest-revenue teams in an effort to better even the playing field when it comes to player salaries. The collective bargaining agreement specifically says that revenue sharing money needs to be used by a team “in an effort to improve its performance on the field.”

What’s interesting here is rebuilds have been done to great success recently. Both the Cubs and Astros stripped their big-league clubs in a rebuild and ended up winning the World Series. They weren’t getting revenue sharing, but does this mean the smaller-market clubs shouldn’t be allowed to rebuild in the same manner? It’s an interesting subject to ponder.

The Pirates didn’t exactly slash payroll, they lowered it about $10 million. The Marlins, however, went from $115 million to it looks like $90 million. Both teams took a step back in competitiveness.

I will note that if caps on signing drafted players and international free agents were not in place, both teams could invest that money in those areas, looking to improve by building up the farm system. I will once again beat the “too many rules” drum. Let teams spend what they want where they want, and allow all players to be free agents at all times; no draft, no caps on amateurs.

This battle will be fun to watch with Derek Jeter, a member of the union, leading the Marlins. It reminds me of this episode of the sitcom Arnie. The premise of the show is that Arnie is a factory worker who is promoted to an executive position. The episodes follow his trials and tribulations in adjusting to his new position. In this episode:

“Arnie has no heart for the task at hand: negotiating a new union contract with his loading dock buddies. The new executive is still a union man.”

I think Jeter is going to lose some friends in this one.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2BwtFI3

Running and Skipping in Boots

Why Would We Ever Do Anything Outside Our ICP

I just read a good article on ABM, ABS, ABE  (Account Based Marketing, Sales, Everything).  It was well written and provided good advice on how to be more focused and effective in these areas.  Here’s the link.

In every article I read on the topic, one of the first things that comes up with ABM/S/E is focusing on your ICP–Ideal Customer Profile.

I agree 200%!

My issue is, why do we seem to limit this to ABM/S/E?  Everything we do in sales and marketing, by definition, must focus on our ICP!  Why would we waste time, money, and resources chasing after anyone or any organization that is outside our ICP?

This shouldn’t be an “AHA” moment, it’s just plain common sense and great business.

Unfortunately, common sense doesn’t seem so common.

We are deluged, daily, with meaningless, irrelevant messages.  We miss the good ones, simply because they are lost in the volume of garbage.

We have the tools that enable us to identify, target, and develop personalized, relevant, impactful messages to people and organizations in our ICP.  Instead, of using these tools to help us do this,  we chose use them to blanket the world with messages.  And when we don’t get the response rate we want, we send more. (A fool with a tool is still a fool)

Sales people want to fill their funnels.  Rather than focusing viciously on prospects and opportunities that fit their ICP, they cast a wider net–filling their pipelines with stuff that shouldn’t be in there in the first place.  As a result their win rates plummet, their sales cycles get longer, and their managers beat them up for  more pipeline coverage.

I recently saw a company that had a 7 times coverage model and still wasn’t making their numbers!  That’s a sales management problem–they have no idea what their ICP is, so they keep casting a wider net.  I suspect if I look at them in 6 months, they will have a 10+ coverage model and still not be making their numbers.

ICP is not a difficult concept.  It is sales and marketing 101—“Sell to the people that have the problems your product solves, don’t sell to the people that don’t!”

But why don’t we pay attention to it?  Why is it that ABM/S/E has heightened our awareness of it?

Not defining and focusing on your ICP is simply laziness and sloppiness.  It’s bad marketing, bad selling, bad leadership.

Is this that difficult a concept?  What am I missing?



from Partners in EXCELLENCE Blog — Making A Difference http://ift.tt/2EbdHWw

The Hall Voters

U.S.S. Mariner opines on Edgar Martinez falling short of Hall of Fame election. In doing so, the article makes a good point about the voters:

In short, Edgar’s a case that highlights a fundamental disagreement among voters regarding what a HOF player is, and thus what the Hall’s supposed to be. You’ve got those for whom overall career value is key, and then you’ve got those who vote for something more like impact; on how memorable a player was. You’ve got voters who’ll never vote for a designated hitter, two generations after the AL brought the position in. And you’ve got voters who’ll reliably vote for elite closers, a similarly recent development. You’ve got small-hall people who voted against Jeff Bagwell or Larry Walker, and you’ve got people who vote for Omar, Andruw Jones (or Kirby Puckett or Jim Rice) whose overall value would seem to fall short of the voters’ own standards. At the end of the day, the group favoring Edgar and Edgar-like players is winning, and Edgar will be enshrined next year. If you can get past your anger at how Edgar’s been overlooked, it’s actually a really interesting dynamic to watch play out.

3: That dynamic doesn’t map perfectly to the age of the voters, but the Venn diagram is pretty close. The Hall’s recognized that this sort of thing might happen, hence the various Veteran’s Committees that go through and elect some other worthies that the writers may have overlooked. In general – and this is something that’s been discussed in more detail and better style by other writers – the Vets have fundamentally different standards, and thus have elected far more “marginal” cases.

My belief is that the age problem was always there, and part of it was knowing the player versus knowing his stats. The 15 year eligibility rule used to deal with this. Jim Rice is a prime example. The writers who knew Jim Rice did not like him. The writers who didn’t know Jim Rice as a player looked at his stats and voted yes. It took the full twenty years (five year waiting period + 15 ballots) to reach that mass. With only ten years on the ballot now, it will be tougher to elect players who didn’t get along with the writers.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2Dz9ISB

Thursday, January 25, 2018

Brewers Stock Up

In addition to the Christian Yelich deal, the Brewers also signed Lorenzo Cain.

No word yet on terms, but we will update with that info once it becomes available. Go ahead and ignore all the stuff I wrote in the Yelich post about Cain being more likely to be signed by Texas since Milwaukee now wouldn’t be interested.

UPDATE — Jerry Crasnick says the deal is five years, $80 million, which I think was about what was expected heading into the offseason for Cain.

Cain plays 2018 as a 32 year old. He averaged 4.4 WAR over the last three seasons. Starting there and taking a 10% discount, I would expect him to produce 17.6 WAR over the next five years. At $8 million per war, I would value him closer to $140 million. His contract indicates the Brewers are valuing a WAR at about $4.5 million. I suppose that a change in how teams value free agents is afoot, but that means contracts are going to come in a lot lower than what I would expect.

It seems to me that with both Yelich and Cain in the outfield, Ryan Braun will definitely be moving to first base.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2Dzuqlq

Yelich Gets His Wish

Christian Yelich no longer wanted to be on the Marlins. He got his wish today as the Marlins trade the outfielder to the Brewers for four prospects.

Here’s what the Marlins will receive in return:

OF Lewis Brinson
OF Monte Harrison
2B/SS Isan Diaz
RHP Jordan Yamamoto

Brinson, 23, is the headliner. He was recently ranked as baseball’s No. 18 overall prospect by Baseball America and No. 32 by ESPN.com. During an abbreviated MLB stint last summer, he batted .106/.236/.277 in 21 games. Born and raised in Broward county, too!

However, don’t let that concern you. Brinson boasts an impressive .287/.353/.502 batting line across parts of six minor league seasons.

Brinson played about the same amount of time at High A, AA, and AAA. His A and AAA number are great, his AA numbers disappointing. I wonder if there was some part factor involved? Harrison gets on base, with very little power. Diaz just finished his age-21 season. He has yet to rise above A ball, but shows the ability to get on base with occasional power. Yamamoto blows batters away and offers great control. He also just finished his age 21 season.

Brinson and Yamamoto appear to be the prizes to me, but if Diaz turns out to be a plus defender, he might be very useful as well.

As for the Brewers, Yelich should be an improvement over Keon Broxton, who could not repeat the high OBP of his rookie year. He might also enable the Brewers to move Ryan Braun to first base.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2DDuuEx

Chelsea Mews by London Meridian Properties in North Vancouver

Chelsea Mews is located in a prime area of North Vancouver with views of Lions Gate Bridge. Situated on a quiet cul-de-sac, it’s just steps away from public transportation and Norgate Park, plus our homeowners will only be 10 minutes from transit connections that will whisk them to the heart of downtown Vancouver and Stanley Park. Chelsea Mews is also conveniently situated within a 10-minute radius of many attractions and neighborhood amenities such as Park Royal Shopping Centre, Capilano Mall, Grouse Mountain ski resort, Save-on-Foods, and Steve Nash Fitness World.

The post Chelsea Mews by London Meridian Properties in North Vancouver appeared first on Vancouver New Condos.



from Buildings – Vancouver New Condos http://ift.tt/2DAxwWi

Skaven Rat ogre Pt 2

Micro Improvements, A Progress Report

Regular readers of this blog know that I’ve become very interested in the concept of Micro Improvements.   I’ve written about the concepts in these posts:  Plateauing  and The Importance Of Small Changes In Improvng Performance.

For the last couple of months, I’ve been using myself as a guinea pig in making micro improvements in my own performance.  It’s been a fascinating journey–both in the improvements I’m seeing and what I am learning in the process.

I thought I’d give a progress report.

In one of those past posts, I mentioned I have implemented an adaptation of the questions Marshall Goldmith poses in Triggers.

I track myself on 20 items every day.  I score each one on a scale of 1-10, but I never allow a score of 7 (I consider that the wimp-out score–not too good, not too bad.)

The items are significant, in some cases.  For example, “Did I do my best to set clear goals for the day,” and “Did I do my best to achieve those goals in the day?”  Some seem trivial, “Did I do my best to exercise?  Did I do my best to eat healthy foods?”  Some are deeply personal, “Did I do my best to express my love to Kookie?”

The impact has been profound.  Already, I am seeing important changes and improvements.  These are things that I may have been oblivious to, in the past.

Some things I’ve noticed:

  1.  I’ve become more conscious of what I’m doing every day–all day.  Just the act of reviewing these 20 items every morning, thinking about what I’m going to do on each has increased my focus and ability to achieve these 20 things that are important to me.
  2. I noticed on something interesting with items that seemed more “business/professionally” focused, for example setting and achieving my goals for the day.  During the week, my scores were 8-10 (I’ve always tended to be very focused.)  But during the weekends, my scores would be 1-3.  All of a sudden, I realized I define myself in terms of my work.  It’s a hugely unbalanced way to live one’s life.   I decided to change the way I defined myself.  For example, I set goals for the weekend.  They could have been “mow the lawn, clean out the garages.”  Or “go to a concert with some friends, go to an art exhibit.”  I had become unbalanced by defining goals in work/professional terms and not defining goals in terms of who I am–I’m more than my job.  That realization and recognizing that I could define and achieve different goals than just professional has had a profound impact on me.
  3. Maybe it’s me, but I start trying to “game” various parts items on my list.  For example, one item is:  “Did I do my best to minimize distractions?”  Another is, “Did I do my best to exercise?”  I tend to work in 60-90 minute sprints.  Then I need roughly a five minute break.  In the past, I’d hit some of the social media sites, mindlessly, look at news feeds.  All pretty mindless stuff, but sometimes 5 minutes would stretch to 10, then…..  I realized doing this was lowering my distraction scores and my goal scores.  Gaming them, I realized, “What if I do some quick exercises during those 5 minutes?”  Now I have a set of kettlebells in my office.  I’ve developed about 4 routines of 5 minutes each (there’s a cool app for that).  Or I do some quick pushups or other body weight exercises.  So during my breaks, I get 5 minutes of exercise.  My “gaming” the process to minimize distraction had me choosing to do something else important to me.  I’ve discovered all sorts of little things in “gaming” these issues.
  4. There have been some peaks and valleys over the past 2 months.  For the 20 items, my maximum score is 200–I’ve never hit it.  Good days, seem to be 170-185.  Every once in a while, I plummet, I’m at 100-120.  But I learn a lot about those “down days.”  Recently, I had about 3 down days in a row.  I had to figure out how to break the cycle.  I realized I had burned myself out.  On those three days, I had over committed myself, I was busy, but the busyness was turning into meaningless thrashing.  It wasn’t just a few areas that I started doing poorly, my inability to focus, increased my distraction, I didn’t exercise, I didn’t eat well, I was grumpy to Kookie, I was getting poorer at goal setting and not accomplishing my goals….  It’s fascinating that while many of these seem independent, they are actually very interrelated.  Doing well in a few, helps you do better on all of them.  Doing poorly in a few, takes you in a downward spiral in others.
  5. The peaks and valleys were illuminating.  I realized I was creating them and I was in total control.  Most of the time, in the past, the peaks and valleys happened and I wasn’t paying attention.  Now, I can’t escape it.  When I hit a valley, particularly two days in a row, I have to figure out what to do.  For now, it seems if I really concentrate on a few of the items, the others work themselves out—but I’m just experimenting, so I’m not sure.
  6. In recognizing that I had burned out, I realized it was OK, in fact productive, to set goals of “vegging out/chilling” for a few hours.  I also realized how hard it is for me to do that—it’s something I have to work on.
  7. Being “mindful” of these 20 items has made it tougher for me to find excuses not to do these most important things.  For example, when I travel, it’s easy to find an excuse not to exercise or eat as well.  Knowing that every day I’m scoring myself on “Did I do my best….,” makes it almost impossible to make excuses.
  8. The phrasing of these goals is so simple, yet so important.  We sometimes miss our goals, but no one wants to ever admit they haven’t tried to do their best at something.  Knowing that every day, I’m going to score myself on whether I “Did I do my best to…” on 20 items brings great clarity and focus.  The concept of trying to do your best keeps me stretching and pushing myself.
  9. The whole process only takes me about 5 minutes every day.  I do it first thing in the morning.  I review the previous day, scoring myself.  I don’t spend more than 1 second on each item, so it takes me about 20-30 seconds to score myself.  I found when I lingered, I was playing games with myself, “Did I do an 8, or was it a 9, or maybe a 10…”  My first impression is right.  If my immediate reaction is an 8, then that’s it.  I spend a few minutes taking in the whole picture of the previous day and comparing it to other days.  This sets me up to thinking what I need to do for the current day.  “What are my goals for the day, how am I going to make sure I achieve them, what might stand in my way, am I being realistic….”
  10. I think, also, that I am unconsciously raising the bar on myself every day.  To achieve, for example, a “9” today, is more than what I needed to do for that 9 a week ago.  I’m not sure I’m doing this, but since I’m seeing improvements in what I’m accomplishing, I sense that I may be raising the bar on myself.
  11. Bottom line, I’m accomplishing so much more and having more fun doing it  (One of my goals is “Did I do my best to be fully alive.”).

I’m constantly amazed.  This process is so simple and has had so much impact.  I’m still learning and experimenting.  I’m not sure that 20 is the right number for me.  Or that I have the right 20, a few of them are having less meaning to me.  I’ve committed to do this with the current 20 for 6 months.  Then I’ll reassess, the number of items and what each item is.

It’s a fascinating experience.  As I’ve mentioned, the changes are profound.

Try it for yourself:

  1. Choose some areas that you want to focus on.  I think there is a “magic number” for each of us, it can’t be too few, it can’t be too many.
  2. Phrase your assessment, “Did I do my best to…..”  It might be exercise, eat well, learn something new, or minimizing distractions.  It might be prospecting or engaging customers with value.  It may be coaching or engaging the people that work for you.  Identify a few things that are important to you.
  3. They probably shouldn’t be huge things like “solve world hunger,”  or even “making quota.”  but rather important to making progress in the day.  For example, what are the things you need to do every day that result in making quota.
  4. Everyday, score yourself on how you did on a scale of 1-10.  I prefer scoring the previous day in the morning, because it gets me thinking about today.  But you may prefer to do it in the evening.
  5. Do it religiously and commit to if for six months. Don’t let yourself skip–but if you do, leave that day blank–it’s an important signal.
  6. As you get used to it, start “gaming” it.  Start figuring out, “If I do this for this goal, will it help me with other goals?”
  7. Don’t worry about the scores and don’t fool yourself about them.  You will have peaks and valleys.

You’ll be amazed at what happens.

 



from Partners in EXCELLENCE Blog — Making A Difference http://ift.tt/2n9sMkg

Mantle and Jones

Chipper Jones idolized Mickey Mantle, and talks about the time they met, well before Jones was famous:

“It was one of the only times where I found myself, the night before, practicing how I was going to meet somebody in the mirror,” Jones recalled.

When the moment came, he couldn’t get any of the words he had practiced to come out of his mouth.

“That’s how high a pedestal this guy was on,” Jones said, chuckling at the memory.

Composing himself, Jones finally began a conversation.

He wondered how Mantle dealt with the adulation, always carrying himself with a mythical aura that would still drive some fans to tears long after he was done playing.

“Mickey, does this ever get old?” Jones asked. “How do you keep this in perspective?”

Mantle told the young ballplayer of a recurring dream.

“I’m standing at the pearly gates. God walks up, and apparently I’ve got this worried look on my face. He says, ‘Mickey, I’m gonna let you in. But can you sign these dozen baseballs?”

Jones roared with laughter.

So did everyone else in the room.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2DyfLXC

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

The 2018 Hall Election

Chipper Jones, Vladimir Guerrero, Jim Thome, and Trevor Hoffman reach the 371 vote mark to make the Hall of Fame. Congratulations to all!

Edgar Martinez fell 20 votes short. I hope he makes it next season.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2nc3W3l

Different Hall, Different Players

Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens made a Hall of Fame:

Los Angeles – In its ninth annual Hall of Fame election announced Wednesday, the IBWAA added six players to its digital Hall of Fame.

Chipper Jones was the top vote-getter, with 168 out of 170 ballots cast (98.82%). Jim Thome was the runner-up, with 154 votes (90.59%), followed by Mike Mussina (146 votes, 85.88%), Roger Clemens (133, 78.24%), Barry Bonds (130, 76.47%) and Trevor Hoffman (128, 75.29%). A 75% threshold is required for election.

Edgar Martinez (2016) and Vladimir Guerrero (2017) did not appear on the 2018 IBWAA Hall of Fame ballot because they have already been elected in previous years.

With those exceptions, the IBWAA ballot was identical to the one used by the BBWAA. All voting is done electronically.

Per a group decision in January, 2014, the IBWAA allows members to vote for up to 15 players, instead of the previous 10, beginning with the 2015 election. In the 2018 election, 95 members voted for 10 or more candidates. Twenty-seven members voted for 15 candidates. The average vote per member was 10.10.

The IBWAA was ahead of the curve on Guerrero and Martinez, maybe this is a good sign for Bonds and Clemens, as well as Mike Mussina.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2Bq40R6

Consistency Is My Greatest Weapon

Whose Job Is It To Understand The Buyers?

George Bronten just published a fascinating post, “Your Sales Enablement Will Fail Without These 5 Things.”

I agree with him on at least 3 of the 5, and kind of sorta, but not quite agree on the 2 remaining items.  But his first critical success factor really struck me, Understand Your Buyers.  I absolutely agree with this–but thought, is this sufficient?

In some sense, sales is like the tail wagging the dog.  We need to understand our buyers intimately, in order to engage them, and sell our solutions.  But the issue of understanding the customer really has to go back much more deeply in the organization.

Understanding our customers, is at the core of the company’s business strategies and purpose.  The company, not sales, must say, “who do we serve, how do we want to serve them, what do we need to have in place to serve them, how does what we do create value and demand from them?”  The company, not sales, must say, “what problems are we the best in the world at solving, and who has those problems?”

This cascades into Product Development, Product Management, Product Marketing.  They develop the solutions we sell.  They have to be deeply embedded in understanding the customer, how and why they buy, what value we create both in using the solutions, but in engaging them with discussions about the solution.  They have to make sure they are solving problems that our customers want solved, and there are enough customers that may want them solved to support our business goals and strategies.

This ripples through to customer service/customer experience.  Their job isn’t just to help the customer use the product or solve problems they may be having.  They have to make sure the customer is getting the most value from the product, will continue to buy, will continue to grow the relationship, and will continue to refer the product and our company to others.

I could go on, but you get the point, understanding our buyers, being able to walk in their shoes, understanding how the problems we solve helps them more effectively achieve their goals, understanding the dynamics of their customers/competitors, markets and the impact on their own strategies, understanding what might drive them to need to change, how they look at changing, how they look at buying, how they use and realize the value they expected touches virtually every part of  our company.

But here’s the issue/opportunity.

Too often, the rest of the organization, yes even product development/product management, do a terrible job at doing this–at understanding the customer, at understanding the issues George poses in his blog post.  Too often, they are caught in the conundrum of developing the next new product which is an evolution of the previous product, or doing nominal research on what they customer does (so they can design the product), but few really focus deeply on the customer/buyer/user.

Too often, the customer has become too abstract, they don’t really understand the customer, what drives them, their dreams, fears, goals.  Often, when speaking to product managers and developers, I ask, “How many customers have you visited in the last year?  How many people have you talked to?  How many customers have you watched working, so you understand their problems?

Sadly, too many give poor answers.  They read reports, they attend conferences, they get input (from who?), and so on. They seem to be more focused on competitors, watching them, copying them, or staying one feature or function ahead of them.

But, they don’t have an intimate understanding of the “customer.”  They don’t understand the worlds our customer live in, what drives them to change, or what causes them to search/learn, or what causes them to buy.  The customer is an abstraction, and sadly, secondary to their jobs of developing then next new version of the products they have always been developing.

Other parts of the company need to be as intimately knowledgeable of our customers and why/how they buy as sales and marketing.  And if they are, they become very powerful in helping marketing and sales, through sales enablement, to better understand them, and the value we could create with/through them.

Unfortunately, I don’t see this happening, at least to the degree it needs to happen.

I’m not sure it’s sales enablement or sales operations, but perhaps one of the greatest values we can create, in addition to “enabling” sales people to understand the buyer, is to enable the rest of the company to understand the buyer.

Perhaps sales enablement/sales operations has an important a mission of enabling our own organization to become more customer/buyer focused.  In doing this, perhaps enable these organizations to help us better equip and enable our sales teams, and by the way, our customers to succeed.

I think one of the most critical missions of the sales organization–whether we charter sales ops, sales enablement, or someone else to do this, is to sell and advocate internally.  We need to make sure everyone else understands the customer and why/how they buy as intimately as we do.  We need to drive an understanding of the customer, their challenges, and what we must do to engage them, and create value with them, through all parts of their problem solving, change management, buying, utilization journey.

If everyone in the organization has the same intimate understanding of our customers, and why/how they buy, we can all be much more impactful and effective.

Doing this well, helps our customers succeed, as well as each of us.

 



from Partners in EXCELLENCE Blog — Making A Difference http://ift.tt/2DxSPYu

Hall of Fame Day

The Hall of Fame election announcement comes this evening on MLB Network. David Schoenfield at ESPN previews the selections. It looks like three players, Chipper Jones, Jim Thome, and Vladimir Guerrero will get elected. Edgar Martinez and Trevor Hoffman are on the bubble.

Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens are now on their sixth ballots (players remain for 10 years). They continue to see their percentages increase, and both are at 64 percent. The purge of voters from 2015 to 2016 that reduced the number of voters from 549 to 440 helped them, but you have to think that the elections of Mike Piazza in 2016 and Ivan Rodriguez in 2017 — two players caught up in PED speculation — helped as well. The totals for Bonds and Clemens will fall after the private ballots, and it’s not clear that they’re on an inevitable path to the Hall of Fame. It does seem clear that Joe Morgan’s email to all voters in late November asking them not to support PED users — issued from a Hall of Fame email address apparently with the approval of the Hall itself (Morgan is a board member) — has had little effect on voters.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2DF2AHD

Minor League Story

Wanda Adams Fischer recently published a novel on minor league baseball,
Empty Seats. The book received excellent reviews on the Amazon page linked above and on Kirkus.

Ms. Fischer writes:

It’s dedicated to Jack Lanzillotti, who produced games at Fenway Park but was killed, along with his fiancé, by an unlicensed driver who plowed into them as they walked in Copley Square. I also dedicated it to Kirby Puckett, Harmon Killebrew, Dick Radatz, and Bill Monbouquette.

I’ve been a baseball fan since I was eight years old in 1956. I also auditioned for the job of public address announcer at Fenway Park in 2012. Although I didn’t get the job, I made the finals and announced a full game between the Red Sox and Twins that year. That’s how/when I met Jack.

Very cool. You can also hear Wanda on the radio at WAMC in New York with her show, The Hudson River Sampler. Best of luck to Wanda with the book!



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2n7hmg4

Tuesday, January 23, 2018

Random Player Report

The Random Evil Player program selected Nick Delmonico for the next review. Delmonico knew what was at steak as an August call-up for the White Sox, and turned in a good two-month stretch. He hit an impressive .262/.373/.482 in 166 plate appearances, nine of his 37 hits going for home runs.

Delmonico had not shown much power outside of AA, although he always did a good job of getting on base. Since his MLB numbers were way ahead of his minor league numbers, I suspect he will be a good candidate for some regression in 2018. Still, even if he regresses to 90% of his minor league totals, he will be a useful player for the White Sox. The upside is that at seasonal age 24 in 2017 he figured out hitting, and he’ll continue to improve.



from baseballmusings.com http://ift.tt/2F9v89s